Tuesday 9 October 2012

Postal Votes

 Should we have postal votes to decide important issues?
For
  • More democratic
  • Meetings can be packed out by supporters of one side
Against
  • If people can't be bothered to come to meetings it's their fault if the decision goes against them
  • It costs about £100 to do a postal vote
  • It puts more work on the committee
What do you think?
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous9 October 2012 at 03:03

    No, people should get more involved and argue their points in the meetings.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)